K2 Vashon Town Plan/ZONING- What is allowed and what isn't? For better and for worse:
Dow Constantine's proposed amendments to the Vashon Town Plan are here (Pages 13 and 16 are most relevant):
http://tinyurl.com/vashontpwithnfa
I think Dow did a great job balancing interests, considering the division of his constituents. That said, King County CUP (Conditional Use Permit) processes for marijauna growing do seem arduous for the small producer.
To understand where the proposed changes are in the King County process, start by reading Shango Los' report on Yesterday's King County Council TrEE committee meeting about the Vashon Town Plan amendment and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) rules.
http://vimea.org/vimeablog/2014/4/2/no-one-wins
The result of yesterday's committee meeting are that the CUP requirements that seem appropriate for large grow operations, but onerous for smaller ones remain in tact for 2000 sq. ft and above.
The CUP on properties identified by WA State Dept. of Ecology (DoE) as contaminated or suspected to be contaminated triggers a No Further Action (NFA) letter process with DoE through their voluntary cleanup program. This remains in the legislation headed to the King County Council for approval. This is good news for those of us who believe that the community deserves an actual characterization of the site before K2 Sports/Jarden Corporation leave our community.
As Shango describes, the processing required by EdiPure/Bakkhos (potential buyer) is both "Processing 1" and "Processing 2." Processing 1 is allowed on Parcels zoned as Community Business, but Processing 2 is not. Processing 2 is however allowed on parcels zoned "Industrial."
Both parcels used to be zoned Industrial. The parcel with the buildings was rezoned CB (Community Business) by the K2 Commons project/K2 Sports some years ago. The vacant land on the north side is still zoned Industrial. According to the amended town plan, processing 2 is allowed in Industrial and therefore a processing 2/extraction facility could be put there. This is clearly back asswards as that more intensive processing should likely happen in the existing buildings. (Perhaps that could be allowed through a Conditional Use permit - I don't know.) I will paste links to parcel information below.
Ironically, the problematic public process that created this current zoning reality was objected to by islander Tom Bangasser years ago. He was summarily demonized by "the mob" for his protests. Yet, I think what Tom has consistently been trying to tell us all is that Vashon-Maury lacks a community-based process for creating and ENFORCING these sort of planning decisions. He has been correct all along.
The recent efforts by VMICC are commendable. And eventually, we will need an institution - perhaps connected to VMICC - that can legitimately interface with King County, State, and Federal authorities to access resources for market and feasibility studies, etc. Until that happens, our community will likely remain unable to manifest the aspirations articulated through any visioning process.
I believe that a Public Development Authority (PDA) is exactly the kind of institution/tool that our community needs to gain the power we need to both craft and actualize the kind of future sustainable economic and cultural vitality so many of us deserve and long for.
Learning to utilize the KC iMap tool has been very useful to me:
http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/GIS/Maps/iMAP.aspx, you will learn that there are 2 tax lots that K2/Jarden is selling together.
If you don't want to struggle with that tool, see these property descriptions:
http://info.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Detail.aspx?ParcelNbr=3123039161
AND
http://info.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Detail.aspx?ParcelNbr=0622039100